Add UDPRoute implementation #2363
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rainest
force-pushed
the
feat/udproute-controller
branch
from
d21967e
to
be273eb
Compare
rainest
force-pushed
the
feat/udproute-controller
branch
from
be273eb
to
4ffbc1c
Compare
rainest
force-pushed
the
feat/udproute-controller
branch
from
4ffbc1c
to
6a77cda
Compare
|
With #2087 (comment), most questions are relegated to either after experimental features become stable or until after changes to backendRef handling solidify, so this should be good to go. |
shaneutt
suggested changes
Mar 31, 2022
shaneutt
suggested changes
Apr 1, 2022
shaneutt
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds a UDPRoute controller, UDPRoute parser code, and integration test.
Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #2087Special notes for your reviewer:
See #2087 (comment) for some of the design considerations and information on limitations (namely not being able to control the route destination port).
PR Readiness Checklist:
Complete these before marking the PR as
ready to review:CHANGELOG.mdrelease notes have been updated to reflect any significant (and particularly user-facing) changes introduced by this PR